Mini-Series: High Performance Decision-Making (Part 4)

👋 Hi, legend!

Throughout this mini-series, we’ve explored structured models that enhance decision-making, from Expected Value to First-Principles Thinking and Occam’s Razor. However, even the best frameworks can be undermined by cognitive biases—systematic errors in thinking that subtly distort our judgement. Whether in business, leadership, or everyday choices, biases can lead to flawed reasoning and suboptimal outcomes.

This final instalment will equip you with practical strategies to identify and counteract cognitive biases, ensuring your decisions are clear, rational, and well aimed.

Learn how to make AI work for you

AI won’t take your job, but a person using AI might. That’s why 1,000,000+ professionals read The Rundown AI – the free newsletter that keeps you updated on the latest AI news and teaches you how to use it in just 5 minutes a day.

Sign up to start learning.

What Are Cognitive Biases and Why Do They Matter?

Cognitive biases develop as mental shortcuts (heuristics) to help us process vast amounts of information quickly. While these shortcuts often serve us well, they can lead to systematic thinking errors.

The consequences of cognitive biases include:

💔 Poor decision-making in both professional and personal life.

🔁 Reinforcement of incorrect assumptions leading to stagnation.

🪂 Unnecessary risk-taking or, conversely, over-caution that prevents action.

By becoming aware of these biases, we can implement strategies to mitigate their effects and make more effective, data-driven decisions.

Common Cognitive Biases That Impact Decision-Making

✅ Confirmation Bias

The tendency to seek out or favour information that supports existing beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence.

Example: A business leader reviewing reports that confirm their current strategy while dismissing contradictory data or avoiding feedback from employees with differing views. This can lead to missed opportunities, stagnation, and ultimately strategic failure.

⚓️ Anchoring Bias

Over-relying on the first piece of information encountered (the “anchor”) when making decisions.

Example: In salary negotiations, the first number mentioned significantly influences the final agreement, even if it’s unreasonable.

📱Availability Heuristic

Overestimating the likelihood of events based on how easily examples come to mind.

Example: Voters may base their decisions on issues that politicians frequently highlight, believing them to be more urgent or widespread than they actually are. For instance, if a politician repeatedly mentions rising crime rates, voters may perceive crime as a top concern, even if overall crime statistics show a decline. This leads to policy preferences and election outcomes driven by perception instead of facts and data.

🥵 Loss Aversion

The tendency to fear losses more than we value equivalent gains, leading to risk-averse or overly cautious behaviour.

Example: Holding onto a failing investment too long because selling feels like admitting failure. This reluctance can result in even greater financial losses, and prevents reallocation of resources to more profitable opportunities.

🏄 Overconfidence Bias

Believing our knowledge or abilities are greater than they truly are, leading to underestimation of risks.

Example: A CEO expanding into a new field without adequate research, assuming that their prior success in other markets will guarantee results.

Strategies to Overcome Cognitive Biases

✍️ Self-Awareness and Reflection

• Keep a “decision journal” to track choices and evaluate past outcomes.

• Before making a decision, ask: “What assumptions am I making?”

🤼 Seek Diverse Perspectives

• Encourage constructive disagreement within teams to challenge dominant opinions.

• Assign a “devil’s advocate” in discussions to present counterarguments.

🏗️ Apply Structured Decision-Making Frameworks

• Use First-Principles Thinking to break down assumptions and build from the ground up.

• Leverage Expected Value (EV) for data-driven decisions instead of relying on instinct.

🐌 Slow Down and Gather Data

• Delay snap judgments to allow for deeper evaluation.

• Use checklists or predefined criteria to ensure objectivity.

☠️ Conduct a ‘Pre-Mortem’ Analysis

• Before finalising a decision, ask: “If this fails, what will have gone wrong?”

• Reverse-engineering potential failure helps to uncover blind spots.

Conclusion

Cognitive biases are inevitable but manageable with awareness and solid strategies. Even if you only filter out one or two biases next time you make a decision, that could have significant impacts on the accuracy of projections, and ultimately the outcome. When you factor in compounding effects for major life or business decisions, the removal of one little bias at the start could make a world of difference.

This marks the final part of our decision-making mini-series—thanks for following along! If you’ve only just joined us, or you’d like to revisit an earlier part, you can head over to https://www.thehighperformancebrief.co/ to catch up.

Speak soon,

Zac

Disclaimer: The High Performance Brief is for general education purposes only. The content is not a substitute for professional healthcare or psychological services. If you have any health/mental health concerns, please consult a qualified professional.